| ============================================================= |
| reclass — recursive external node classification |
| ============================================================= |
| reclass is © 2007–2013 martin f. krafft <madduck@madduck.net> |
| and available under the terms of the Artistic Licence 2.0 |
| ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' |
| |
| reclass is an "external node classifier" (ENC) as can be used with automation |
| tools, such as Puppet, Salt, and Ansible. |
| |
| The purpose of an ENC is to allow a system administrator to maintain an |
| inventory of nodes to be managed, completely separately from the configuration |
| of the automation tool. Usually, the external node classifier completely |
| replaces the tool-specific inventory (such as site.pp for Puppet, |
| ext_pillar/master_tops for Salt, or /etc/ansible/hosts). |
| |
| reclass allows you to define your nodes through class inheritance, while |
| always able to override details of classes further up the tree. Think of |
| classes as feature sets, as commonalities between nodes, or as tags. Add to |
| that the ability to nest classes (multiple inheritance is allowed, |
| well-defined, and encouraged), and piece together your infrastructure from |
| smaller bits, eliminating redundancy and exposing all important parameters to |
| a single location, logically organised. |
| |
| In general, the ENC fulfills two jobs: |
| |
| - it provides information about groups of nodes and group memberships |
| - it gives access to node-specific information, such as variables |
| |
| In this document, you will find an overview of the concepts of reclass and the |
| way it works. Have a look at README.Salt and README.Ansible for information |
| about integration of reclass with these tools. |
| |
| Installation |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| Before you can use reclass, you need to run make to configure the scripts to |
| your system. Right now, this only involves setting the full path to the |
| Python interpreter. |
| |
| make |
| |
| If your Python interpreter is not /usr/bin/python and is also not in your |
| $PATH, then you need to pass that to make, e.g. |
| |
| make PYTHON=/opt/local/bin/python |
| |
| reclass concepts |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| reclass assumes a node-centric perspective into your inventory. This is |
| obvious when you query reclass for node-specific information, but it might not |
| be clear when you ask reclass to provide you with a list of groups. In that |
| case, reclass loops over all nodes it can find in its database, reads all |
| information it can find about the nodes, and finally reorders the result to |
| provide a list of groups with the nodes they contain. |
| |
| Since the term 'groups' is somewhat ambiguous, it helps to start off with |
| a short glossary of reclass-specific terminology: |
| |
| node: A node, usually a computer in your infrastructure |
| class: A category, tag, feature, or role that applies to a node |
| Classes may be nested, i.e. there can be a class hierarchy |
| application: A specific set of behaviour to apply to members of a class |
| parameter: Node-specific variables, with inheritance throughout the class |
| hierarchy. |
| |
| A class consists of zero or more parent classes, zero or more applications, |
| and any number of parameters. |
| |
| A node is almost equivalent to a class, except that it usually does not (but |
| can) specify applications. |
| |
| When reclass parses a node (or class) definition and encounters a parent |
| class, it recurses to this parent class first before reading any data of the |
| node (or class). When reclass returns from the recursive, depth first walk, it |
| then merges all information of the current node (or class) into the |
| information it obtained during the recursion. |
| |
| Furthermore, a node (or class) may define a list of classes it derives from, |
| in which case classes defined further down the list will be able to override |
| classes further up the list. |
| |
| Information in this context is essentially one of a list of applications or |
| a list of parameters. |
| |
| The interaction between the depth-first walk and the delayed merging of data |
| means that the node (and any class) may override any of the data defined by |
| any of the parent classes (ancestors). This is in line with the assumption |
| that more specific definitions ("this specific host") should have a higher |
| precedence than more general definitions ("all webservers", which includes all |
| webservers in Munich, which includes "this specific host", for example). |
| |
| Here's a quick example, showing how parameters accumulate and can get |
| replaced. |
| |
| All unixnodes (i.e. nodes who have the 'unixnodes' class in their ancestry) |
| have /etc/motd centrally-managed (through the 'motd' application), and the |
| unixnodes class definition provides a generic message-of-the-day to be put |
| into this file. |
| |
| All debiannodes, which are descendants of unixnodes, should include the |
| Debian codename in this message, so the message-of-the-day is overwritten in |
| the debiannodes class. |
| |
| The node 'quantum.example.org' will have a scheduled downtime this weekend, |
| so until Monday, an appropriate message-of-the-day is added to the node |
| definition. |
| |
| When the 'motd' application runs, it receives the appropriate |
| message-of-the-day (from 'quantum.example.org' when run on that node) and |
| writes it into /etc/motd. |
| |
| At this point it should be noted that parameters whose values are lists or |
| key-value pairs don't get overwritten by children classes or node definitions, |
| but the information gets merged (recursively) instead. |
| |
| Similarly to parameters, applications also accumulate during the recursive |
| walk through the class ancestry. It is possible for a node or child class to |
| _remove_ an application added by a parent class, by prefixing the application |
| with '~'. |
| |
| Finally, reclass happily lets you use multiple inheritance, and ensures that |
| the resolution of parameters is still well-defined. Here's another example |
| building upon the one about /etc/motd above: |
| |
| 'quantum.example.org' (which is back up and therefore its node definition no |
| longer contains a message-of-the-day) is at a site in Munich. Therefore, it |
| is a child of the class 'hosted@munich'. This class is independent of the |
| 'unixnode' hierarchy, 'quantum.example.org' derives from both. |
| |
| In this example infrastructure, 'hosted@munich' is more specific than |
| 'debiannodes' because there are plenty of Debian nodes at other sites (and |
| some non-Debian nodes in Munich). Therefore, 'quantum.example.org' derives |
| from 'hosted@munich' _after_ 'debiannodes'. |
| |
| When an electricity outage is expected over the weekend in Munich, the admin |
| can change the message-of-the-day in the 'hosted@munich' class, and it will |
| apply to all hosts in Munich. |
| |
| However, not all hosts in Munich have /etc/motd, because some of them are |
| 'windowsnodes'. Since the 'windowsnodes' ancestry does not specify the |
| 'motd' application, those hosts have access to the message-of-the-day in the |
| node variables, but the message won't get used… |
| |
| … unless, of course, 'windowsnodes' specified a Windows-specific application |
| to bring such notices to the attention of the user. |
| |
| It's also trivial to ensure a certain order of class evaluation. Here's |
| another example: |
| |
| The 'ssh.server' class defines the 'permit_root_login' parameter to 'no'. |
| |
| The 'backuppc.client' class defines the parameter to 'without-password', |
| because the BackupPC server might need to log in to the host as root. |
| |
| Now, what happens if the admin accidentally provides the following two |
| classes? |
| |
| - backuppc.client |
| - ssh.server |
| |
| Theoretically, this would mean 'permit_root_login' gets set to 'no'. |
| |
| However, since all 'backuppc.client' nodes need 'ssh.server' (at least in |
| most setups), the class 'backuppc.client' itself derives from 'ssh.server', |
| ensuring that it gets parsed before 'backuppc.client'. |
| |
| When reclass returns to the node and encounters the 'ssh.server' class |
| defined there, it simply skips it, as it's already been processed. |
| |
| reclass operations |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| While reclass has been built to support different storage backends through |
| plugins, currently only the 'yaml_fs' storage backend exists. This is a very |
| simple, yet powerful, YAML-based backend, using flat files on the filesystem |
| (as suggested by the _fs postfix). |
| |
| yaml_fs works with two directories, one for node definitions, and another for |
| class definitions. It is possible to use a single directory for both, but that |
| could get messy and is therefore not recommended. |
| |
| Files in those directories are YAML-files, specifying key-value pairs. The |
| following three keys are read by reclass: |
| |
| classes: a list of parent classes |
| appliations: a list of applications to append to the applications defined by |
| ancestors. If an application name starts with '~', it would |
| remove this application from the list, if it had already been |
| added — but it does not prevent a future addition. |
| E.g. '~firewalled' |
| parameters: key-value pairs to set defaults in class definitions, override |
| existing data, or provide node-specific information in node |
| specifications. |
| By convention, parameters corresponding to an application |
| should be provided as subkey-value pairs, keyed by the name of |
| the application, e.g. |
| |
| applications: |
| - ssh.server |
| parameters: |
| ssh.server: |
| permit_root_login: no |
| |
| reclass starts out reading a node definition file, obtains the list of |
| classes, then reads the files corresponding to these classes, recursively |
| reading parent classes, and finally merges the applications list (append |
| unless |
| |
| Version control |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| I recommend you maintain your reclass inventory database in Git, right from |
| the start. |
| |
| Usage |
| ~~~~~ |
| For information on how to use reclass directly, invoke reclass.py with --help |
| and study the output. |
| |
| The three options --inventory-base-uri, --nodes-uri, and --classes-uri |
| together specify the location of the inventory. If the base URI is specified, |
| then it is prepended to the other two URIs, unless they are absolute URIs. If |
| these two URIs are not specified, they default to 'nodes' and 'classes'. |
| Therefore, if your inventory is in '/etc/reclass/nodes' and |
| '/etc/reclass/classes', all you need to specify is the base URI as |
| '/etc/reclass'. |
| |
| More commonly, however, use of reclass will happen indirectly, and through |
| so-called adapters, e.g. /…/reclass/adapters/salt. The job of an adapter is to |
| translate between different invocation paradigms, provide a sane set of |
| default options, and massage the data from reclass into the format expected by |
| the automation tool in use. |
| |
| Configuration file |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| reclass can read some of its configuration from a file. The file is |
| a YAML-file and simply defines key-value pairs. |
| |
| The configuration file can be used to set defaults for all the options that |
| are otherwise configurable via the command-line interface, so please use the |
| --help output of reclass for reference. The command-line option '--nodes-uri' |
| corresponds to the key 'nodes_uri' in the configuration file. For example: |
| |
| storage_type: yaml_fs |
| pretty_print: True |
| output: json |
| inventory_base_uri: /etc/reclass |
| nodes_uri: ../nodes |
| |
| reclass first looks in the current directory for the file called |
| 'reclass-config.yml' and if no such file is found, it looks "next to" the |
| reclass script itself. Adapters implement their own lookup logic. |
| |
| Contributing to reclass |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| Conttributions to reclass are very welcome. Since I prefer to keep a somewhat |
| clean history, I will not merge pull requests. Please send your patches using |
| git-format-patch and git-send-e-mail to reclass@pobox.madduck.net. |
| |
| I have added rudimentary unit tests, and it would be nice if you could submit |
| your changes with appropriate changes to the tests. To run tests, invoke |
| ./run_tests.py in the top-level checkout directory. |
| |
| If you have larger ideas, I'll be looking forward to discuss them with you. |
| |
| -- martin f. krafft <madduck@madduck.net> Fri, 14 Jun 2013 22:12:05 +0200 |