| ============================================================= |
| reclass — recursive external node classification |
| ============================================================= |
| reclass is © 2007–2013 martin f. krafft <madduck@madduck.net> |
| and available under the terms of the Artistic Licence 2.0 |
| ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' |
| |
| Please make sure to read the generic information in the README file first, or |
| alongside this document. |
| |
| Quick start with Salt |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| The following steps should get you up and running quickly. You will need to |
| decide for yourself where to put your reclass inventory. This can be |
| /etc/reclass, or it could be /srv/salt, for instance if /srv/salt/states is |
| where your Salt file_roots live. The following shall assume the latter. |
| |
| Or you can also just look into ./examples/salt of your reclass checkout, |
| where the following steps have already been prepared. |
| |
| /…/reclass refers to the location of your reclass checkout. |
| |
| 1. Symlink /…/reclass/adapters/ansible to /etc/ansible/hosts (or |
| ./hacking/hosts) |
| |
| 2. Copy the two directories 'nodes' and 'classes' from the example |
| subdirectory in the reclass checkout to /etc/ansible |
| |
| If you prefer to put those directories elsewhere, you can create |
| /etc/ansible/reclass-config.yml with contents such as |
| |
| storage_type: yaml_fs |
| nodes_uri: /srv/reclass/nodes |
| classes_uri: /srv/reclass/classes |
| |
| Note that yaml_fs is currently the only supported storage_type, and it's |
| the default if you don't set it. |
| |
| 3. Check out your inventory by invoking |
| |
| ./hosts --list |
| |
| which should return 5 groups in JSON-format, and each group has exactly |
| one member 'localhost'. |
| |
| 4. See the node information for 'localhost': |
| |
| ./hosts --host localhost |
| |
| This should print a set of keys and values, including a greeting, |
| a colour, and a sub-class called 'RECLASS'. |
| |
| 5. Execute some ansible commands, e.g. |
| |
| ansible -i hosts \* --list-hosts |
| ansible -i hosts \* -m ping |
| ansible -i hosts \* -m debug -a 'msg="${greeting}"' |
| ansible -i hosts \* -m setup |
| ansible-playbook -i hosts test.yml |
| |
| 6. You can also invoke reclass directly, which gives a slightly different |
| view onto the same data, i.e. before it has been adapted for Ansible: |
| |
| /…/reclass.py --pretty-print --inventory |
| /…/reclass.py --pretty-print --nodeinfo localhost |
| |
| Integration with Salt |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| The integration between reclass and Ansible is performed through an adapter, |
| and needs not be of our concern too much. |
| |
| However, Ansible has no concept of "nodes", "applications", "parameters", and |
| "classes". Therefore it is necessary to explain how those correspond to |
| Ansible. Crudely, the following mapping exists: |
| |
| nodes hosts |
| classes groups |
| applications playbooks |
| parameters host_vars |
| |
| reclass does not provide any group_vars because of its node-centric |
| perspective. While class definitions include parameters, those are inherited |
| by the node definitions and hence become node_vars. |
| |
| reclass also does not provide playbooks, nor does it deal with any of the |
| related Ansible concepts, i.e. vars_files, vars, tasks, handlers, roles, etc.. |
| |
| Let it be said at this point that you'll probably want to stop using |
| host_vars, group_vars and vars_files altogether, and if only because you |
| should no longer need them, but also because the variable precedence rules |
| of Ansible are full of surprises, at least to me. |
| |
| reclass' Ansible adapter massage the reclass output into Ansible-usable data, |
| namely: |
| |
| - Every class in the ancestry of a node becomes a group to Ansible. This is |
| mainly useful to be able to target nodes during interactive use of |
| Ansible, e.g. |
| |
| ansible debiannode@wheezy -m command -a 'apt-get upgrade' |
| → upgrade all Debian nodes running wheezy |
| |
| ansible ssh.server -m command -a 'invoke-rc.d ssh restart' |
| → restart all SSH server processes |
| |
| ansible mailserver -m command -a 'tail -n1000 /var/log/mail.err' |
| → obtain the last 1,000 lines of all mailserver error log files |
| |
| The attentive reader might stumble over the use of singular words, whereas |
| it might make more sense to address all 'mailserver*s*' with this tool. |
| This is convention and up to you. I prefer to think of my node as |
| a (singular) mailserver when I add 'mailserver' to its parent classes. |
| |
| - Every entry in the list of a host's applications might well correspond to |
| an Ansible playbook. Therefore, reclass creates a (Ansible-)group for |
| every application, and adds '_hosts' to the name. This postfix can be |
| configured with a CLI option (--applications-postfix) or in the |
| configuration file (applications_postfix). |
| |
| For instance, the ssh.server class adds the ssh.server application to |
| a node's application list. Now the admin might create an Ansible playbook |
| like so: |
| |
| - name: SSH server management |
| hosts: ssh.server_hosts ← SEE HERE |
| tasks: |
| - name: install SSH package |
| action: … |
| … |
| |
| There's a bit of redundancy in this, but unfortunately Ansible playbooks |
| hardcode the nodes to which a playbook applies. |
| |
| It's now trivial to apply this playbook across your infrastructure: |
| |
| ansible-playbook ssh.server.yml |
| |
| My suggested way to use Ansible site-wide is then to create a 'site' |
| playbook that includes all the other playbooks (which shall hopefully be |
| based on Ansible roles), and then to invoke Ansible like this: |
| |
| ansible-playbook site.yml |
| |
| or, if you prefer only to reconfigure a subset of nodes, e.g. all |
| webservers: |
| |
| ansible-playbook site.yml --limit webserver |
| |
| Again, if the singular word 'webserver' puts you off, change the |
| convention as you wish. |
| |
| And if anyone comes up with a way to directly connect groups in the |
| inventory with roles, thereby making it unnecessary to write playbook |
| files (containing redundant information), please tell me! |
| |
| - Parameters corresponding to a node become host_vars for that host. |
| |
| It is possible to include Jinja2-style variables like you would in Ansible, |
| in parameter values. This is especially powerful in combination with the |
| recursive merging, e.g. |
| |
| parameters: |
| motd: |
| greeting: Welcome to {{ ansible_fqdn }}! |
| closing: This system is part of {{ realm }} |
| |
| Now you just need to specify realm somewhere. The reference can reside in |
| a parent class, while the variable is defined e.g. in the node. |