CONTRIBUTING.md

# Contributing to gophercloud

- [Getting started](#getting-started)
- [Tests](#tests)
- [Style guide](#basic-style-guide)
- [4 ways to get involved](#4-ways-to-get-involved)

## Getting started

There should be no fundamental differences of setup between contributors and
normal end-users. The only thing to bear in mind is that you will need to add a
few extra environment variables for acceptance tests - this is documented in
our [acceptance tests readme](/acceptance).

## Tests

When working on a new or existing feature, testing will be the backbone of your
work since it helps uncover and prevent regressions in the codebase. There are
two types of test we use in gophercloud: unit tests and acceptance tests, which
are both described below.

### Unit tests

Unit tests are the fine-grained tests that establish and ensure the behaviour
of individual units of functionality. We usually test on an
operation-by-operation basis (an operation typically being an API action) with
the use of mocking to set up explicit expectations. Each operation will set up
its HTTP response expectation, and then test how the system responds when fed
this controlled, pre-determined input.

To make life easier, we've introduced a bunch of test helpers to simplify the
process of testing expectations with assertions:

```go
import (
  "testing"

  "github.com/rackspace/gophercloud/testhelper"
)

func TestSomething(t *testing.T) {
  result, err := Operation()

  testhelper.AssertEquals(t, "foo", result.Bar)
  testhelper.AssertNoErr(t, err)
}

func TestSomethingElse(t *testing.T) {
  testhelper.CheckEquals(t, "expected", "actual")
}
```

`AssertEquals` and `AssertNoErr` will throw a fatal error if a value does not
match an expected value or if an error has been declared, respectively. You can
also use `CheckEquals` and `CheckNoErr` for the same purpose; the only difference
being that `t.Errorf` is raised rather than `t.Fatalf`.

Here is a truncated example of mocked HTTP responses:

```go
import (
	"testing"

	th "github.com/rackspace/gophercloud/testhelper"
	fake "github.com/rackspace/gophercloud/testhelper/client"
)

func TestGet(t *testing.T) {
	// Setup the HTTP request multiplexer and server
	th.SetupHTTP()
	defer th.TeardownHTTP()

	th.Mux.HandleFunc("/networks/d32019d3-bc6e-4319-9c1d-6722fc136a22", func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
		// Test we're using the correct HTTP method
		th.TestMethod(t, r, "GET")

		// Test we're setting the auth token
		th.TestHeader(t, r, "X-Auth-Token", fake.TokenID)

		// Set the appropriate headers for our mocked response
		w.Header().Add("Content-Type", "application/json")
		w.WriteHeader(http.StatusOK)

		// Set the HTTP body
		fmt.Fprintf(w, `
{
    "network": {
        "status": "ACTIVE",
        "name": "private-network",
        "admin_state_up": true,
        "tenant_id": "4fd44f30292945e481c7b8a0c8908869",
        "shared": true,
        "id": "d32019d3-bc6e-4319-9c1d-6722fc136a22"
    }
}
			`)
	})

	// Call our API operation
	network, err := Get(fake.ServiceClient(), "d32019d3-bc6e-4319-9c1d-6722fc136a22").Extract()

	// Assert no errors and equality
	th.AssertNoErr(t, err)
	th.AssertEquals(t, n.Status, "ACTIVE")
}
```

### Acceptance tests

As we've already mentioned, unit tests have a very narrow and confined focus -
they test small units of behaviour. Acceptance tests on the other hand have a
far larger scope: they are fully functional tests that test the entire API of a
service in one fell swoop. They don't care about unit isolation or mocking
expectations, they instead do a full run-through and consequently test how the
entire system _integrates_ together. When an API satisfies expectations, it
proves by default that the requirements for a contract have been met.

### Running tests

To run all tests:

```bash
go test ./...
```

To run all tests with verbose output:

```bash
go test -v ./...
```

To run tests that match certain [build tags]():

```bash
go test -tags "foo bar" ./...
```

To run tests for a particular sub-package:

```bash
cd ./path/to/package && go test .
```

## Basic style guide

We follow the standard formatting recommendations and language idioms set out
in the [Effective Go](https://golang.org/doc/effective_go.html) guide. It's
definitely worth reading - but the relevant sections are
[formatting](https://golang.org/doc/effective_go.html#formatting)
and [names](https://golang.org/doc/effective_go.html#names).

## 4 ways to get involved

There are four main ways you can get involved in our open-source project, and
each is described briefly below. Once you've made up your mind and decided on
your fix, you will need to follow the same basic steps that all submissions are
required to adhere to:

1. [fork](https://help.github.com/articles/fork-a-repo/) the `rackspace/gophercloud` repository
2. checkout a [new branch](https://github.com/Kunena/Kunena-Forum/wiki/Create-a-new-branch-with-git-and-manage-branches)
3. ensure all your commits are [well-organized](https://help.github.com/articles/about-git-rebase/)
4. submit your branch as a [pull request](https://help.github.com/articles/creating-a-pull-request/)

### 1. Fixing bugs

If you want to start fixing open bugs, we'd really appreciate that! Bug fixing
is central to any project. The best way to get started is by heading to our
[bug tracker](https://github.com/rackspace/gophercloud/issues) and finding open
bugs that you think nobody is working on. It might be useful to comment on the
thread to see the current state of the issue and if anybody has made any
breakthroughs on it so far.

### 2. Improving documentation

We have three forms of documentation:

* short README documents that briefly introduce a topic
* reference documentation on [godoc.org](http://godoc.org) that is automatically
generated from source code comments
* user documentation on our [homepage](http://gophercloud.io) that includes
getting started guides, installation guides and code samples

If you feel that a certain section could be improved - whether its to clarify
ambiguity or fix a grammatical mistake - please feel entitled to do so! We
welcome doc pull requests with the same childlike enthusiasm as any other
contribution!

### 3. Optimizing existing features

If you would like to improve or optimize an existing feature, please be aware
that we adhere to [semantic versioning](http://semver.org) - which means that
we cannot introduce breaking changes to the API without a major version change
(v1.x -> v2.x). Making that leap is a big step, so we encourage contributors to
refactor rather than rewrite. Running tests will prevent regression and avoid
the possibility of breaking somebody's current implementation.

### 4. Working on a new feature

If you've found something we've left out, definitely feel free to start work on
introducing that feature. It's always useful to open an issue first to indicate
your intent to a core contributor - this enables quick feedback and can help
steer you in the right direction by avoiding known issues. It might also help
you avoid losing time implementing something that might not ever work.

You must ensure that all of your work is well tested - both in terms of unit
and acceptance tests. Untested code will not be merged because it introduces
too much of a risk to end-users.

Happy hacking!