diff --git a/etc/patrole.conf.sample b/etc/patrole.conf.sample
index 5816ea9..518d38a 100644
--- a/etc/patrole.conf.sample
+++ b/etc/patrole.conf.sample
@@ -28,15 +28,15 @@
 
 #
 # This option determines whether Patrole should run against a
-# `custom_requirements_file` which defines RBAC requirements. The
+# ``custom_requirements_file`` which defines RBAC requirements. The
 # purpose of setting this flag to True is to verify that RBAC policy
 # is in accordance to requirements. The idea is that the
-# `custom_requirements_file` perfectly defines what the RBAC
+# ``custom_requirements_file`` perfectly defines what the RBAC
 # requirements are.
 #
 # Here are the possible outcomes when running the Patrole tests
 # against
-# a `custom_requirements_file`:
+# a ``custom_requirements_file``:
 #
 # YAML definition: allowed
 # test run: allowed
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
 #
 # YAML definition: allowed
 # test run: not allowed
-# test result: fail (under-permission)
+# test result: fail (under-permission, e.g. Forbidden exception)
 #
 # YAML definition: not allowed
 # test run: allowed
@@ -53,30 +53,32 @@
 #test_custom_requirements = false
 
 #
-# File path of the yaml file that defines your RBAC requirements. This
-# file must be located on the same host that Patrole runs on. The yaml
+# File path of the YAML file that defines your RBAC requirements. This
+# file must be located on the same host that Patrole runs on. The YAML
 # file should be written as follows:
 #
 # ```
-# <service>:
-#   <api_action>:
-#     - <allowed_role>
-#     - <allowed_role>
-#     - <allowed_role>
-#   <api_action>:
-#     - <allowed_role>
-#     - <allowed_role>
-# <service>
-#   <api_action>:
-#     - <allowed_role>
+# <service_foo>:
+#   <api_action_x>:
+#     - <allowed_role_a>
+#     - <allowed_role_b>
+#     - <allowed_role_c>
+#   <api_action_y>:
+#     - <allowed_role_d>
+#     - <allowed_role_e>
+# <service_bar>:
+#   <api_action_z>:
+#     - <allowed_role_b>
 # ```
+#
 # Where:
-# service = the service that is being tested (cinder, nova, etc)
+#
+# service = the service that is being tested (Cinder, Nova, etc.)
 # api_action = the policy action that is being tested. Examples:
 #              - volume:create
 #              - os_compute_api:servers:start
 #              - add_image
-# allowed_role = the Keystone role that is allowed to perform the API
+# allowed_role = the Keystone role that is allowed to perform the API.
 #  (string value)
 #custom_requirements_file = <None>
 
diff --git a/patrole_tempest_plugin/config.py b/patrole_tempest_plugin/config.py
index 5103888..f379859 100644
--- a/patrole_tempest_plugin/config.py
+++ b/patrole_tempest_plugin/config.py
@@ -41,13 +41,13 @@
                 default=False,
                 help="""
 This option determines whether Patrole should run against a
-`custom_requirements_file` which defines RBAC requirements. The
+``custom_requirements_file`` which defines RBAC requirements. The
 purpose of setting this flag to True is to verify that RBAC policy
 is in accordance to requirements. The idea is that the
-`custom_requirements_file` perfectly defines what the RBAC requirements are.
+``custom_requirements_file`` perfectly defines what the RBAC requirements are.
 
 Here are the possible outcomes when running the Patrole tests against
-a `custom_requirements_file`:
+a ``custom_requirements_file``:
 
 YAML definition: allowed
 test run: allowed
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
 
 YAML definition: allowed
 test run: not allowed
-test result: fail (under-permission)
+test result: fail (under-permission, e.g. Forbidden exception)
 
 YAML definition: not allowed
 test run: allowed
@@ -63,30 +63,32 @@
 """),
     cfg.StrOpt('custom_requirements_file',
                help="""
-File path of the yaml file that defines your RBAC requirements. This
-file must be located on the same host that Patrole runs on. The yaml
+File path of the YAML file that defines your RBAC requirements. This
+file must be located on the same host that Patrole runs on. The YAML
 file should be written as follows:
 
 ```
-<service>:
-  <api_action>:
-    - <allowed_role>
-    - <allowed_role>
-    - <allowed_role>
-  <api_action>:
-    - <allowed_role>
-    - <allowed_role>
-<service>
-  <api_action>:
-    - <allowed_role>
+<service_foo>:
+  <api_action_x>:
+    - <allowed_role_a>
+    - <allowed_role_b>
+    - <allowed_role_c>
+  <api_action_y>:
+    - <allowed_role_d>
+    - <allowed_role_e>
+<service_bar>:
+  <api_action_z>:
+    - <allowed_role_b>
 ```
+
 Where:
-service = the service that is being tested (cinder, nova, etc)
+
+service = the service that is being tested (Cinder, Nova, etc.)
 api_action = the policy action that is being tested. Examples:
              - volume:create
              - os_compute_api:servers:start
              - add_image
-allowed_role = the Keystone role that is allowed to perform the API
+allowed_role = the Keystone role that is allowed to perform the API.
 """)
 ]
 
diff --git a/patrole_tempest_plugin/policy_authority.py b/patrole_tempest_plugin/policy_authority.py
index 25dcea6..9499bf6 100644
--- a/patrole_tempest_plugin/policy_authority.py
+++ b/patrole_tempest_plugin/policy_authority.py
@@ -274,9 +274,9 @@
         access_data['is_admin'] = is_admin
         # TODO(felipemonteiro): Dynamically calculate is_admin_project rather
         # than hard-coding it to True. is_admin_project cannot be determined
-        # from the role, but rather from project and domain names. See
-        # _populate_is_admin_project in keystone.token.providers.common
-        # for more information.
+        # from the role, but rather from project and domain names. For more
+        # information, see:
+        # https://github.com/openstack/keystone/blob/37ce5417418f8acbd27f3dacb70c605b0fe48301/keystone/token/providers/common.py#L150
         access_data['is_admin_project'] = True
 
         class Object(object):
diff --git a/patrole_tempest_plugin/rbac_exceptions.py b/patrole_tempest_plugin/rbac_exceptions.py
index 5ee65ae..e75b8ec 100644
--- a/patrole_tempest_plugin/rbac_exceptions.py
+++ b/patrole_tempest_plugin/rbac_exceptions.py
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
 
 
 class RbacResourceSetupFailed(exceptions.TempestException):
-    message = "Rbac resource setup failed"
+    message = "RBAC resource setup failed"
 
 
 class RbacOverPermission(exceptions.TempestException):
diff --git a/patrole_tempest_plugin/rbac_rule_validation.py b/patrole_tempest_plugin/rbac_rule_validation.py
index d3213cf..69a43ea 100644
--- a/patrole_tempest_plugin/rbac_rule_validation.py
+++ b/patrole_tempest_plugin/rbac_rule_validation.py
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
 import logging
 import sys
 
+from oslo_log import versionutils
 from oslo_utils import excutils
 import six
 
@@ -36,7 +37,8 @@
 RBACLOG = logging.getLogger('rbac_reporting')
 
 
-def action(service, rule='', expected_error_code=403, extra_target_data=None):
+def action(service, rule='', rules=None, expected_error_code=403,
+           extra_target_data=None):
     """A decorator for verifying OpenStack policy enforcement.
 
     A decorator which allows for positive and negative RBAC testing. Given:
@@ -67,15 +69,18 @@
 
     As such, negative and positive testing can be applied using this decorator.
 
-    :param service: An OpenStack service. Examples: "nova" or "neutron".
-    :param rule: A policy action defined in a policy.json file (or in
-        code).
+    :param str service: An OpenStack service. Examples: "nova" or "neutron".
+    :param str rule: (DEPRECATED) A policy action defined in a policy.json file
+        or in code.
+    :param list rules: A list of policy actions defined in a policy.json file
+        or in code. The rules are logical-ANDed together to derive the expected
+        result.
 
         .. note::
 
             Patrole currently only supports custom JSON policy files.
 
-    :param expected_error_code: Overrides default value of 403 (Forbidden)
+    :param int expected_error_code: Overrides default value of 403 (Forbidden)
         with endpoint-specific error code. Currently only supports 403 and 404.
         Support for 404 is needed because some services, like Neutron,
         intentionally throw a 404 for security reasons.
@@ -85,11 +90,11 @@
             A 404 should not be provided *unless* the endpoint masks a
             ``Forbidden`` exception as a ``NotFound`` exception.
 
-    :param extra_target_data: Dictionary, keyed with ``oslo.policy`` generic
-        check names, whose values are string literals that reference nested
-        ``tempest.test.BaseTestCase`` attributes. Used by ``oslo.policy`` for
-        performing matching against attributes that are sent along with the API
-        calls. Example::
+    :param dict extra_target_data: Dictionary, keyed with ``oslo.policy``
+        generic check names, whose values are string literals that reference
+        nested ``tempest.test.BaseTestCase`` attributes. Used by
+        ``oslo.policy`` for performing matching against attributes that are
+        sent along with the API calls. Example::
 
             extra_target_data={
                 "target.token.user_id":
@@ -113,6 +118,8 @@
     if extra_target_data is None:
         extra_target_data = {}
 
+    rules = _prepare_rules(rule, rules)
+
     def decorator(test_func):
         role = CONF.patrole.rbac_test_role
 
@@ -125,8 +132,14 @@
                     '`rbac_rule_validation` decorator can only be applied to '
                     'an instance of `tempest.test.BaseTestCase`.')
 
-            allowed = _is_authorized(test_obj, service, rule,
-                                     extra_target_data)
+            allowed = True
+            disallowed_rules = []
+            for rule in rules:
+                _allowed = _is_authorized(
+                    test_obj, service, rule, extra_target_data)
+                if not _allowed:
+                    disallowed_rules.append(rule)
+                allowed = allowed and _allowed
 
             expected_exception, irregular_msg = _get_exception_type(
                 expected_error_code)
@@ -148,8 +161,12 @@
                 if irregular_msg:
                     LOG.warning(irregular_msg.format(rule, service))
                 if allowed:
-                    msg = ("Role %s was not allowed to perform %s." %
-                           (role, rule))
+                    msg = ("Role %s was not allowed to perform the following "
+                           "actions: %s. Expected allowed actions: %s. "
+                           "Expected disallowed actions: %s." % (
+                               role, sorted(rules),
+                               sorted(set(rules) - set(disallowed_rules)),
+                               sorted(disallowed_rules)))
                     LOG.error(msg)
                     raise exceptions.Forbidden(
                         "%s Exception was: %s" % (msg, e))
@@ -164,10 +181,14 @@
                     LOG.error(msg)
             else:
                 if not allowed:
-                    LOG.error("Role %s was allowed to perform %s", role, rule)
-                    raise rbac_exceptions.RbacOverPermission(
-                        "OverPermission: Role %s was allowed to perform %s" %
-                        (role, rule))
+                    msg = (
+                        "OverPermission: Role %s was allowed to perform the "
+                        "following disallowed actions: %s" % (
+                            role, sorted(disallowed_rules)
+                        )
+                    )
+                    LOG.error(msg)
+                    raise rbac_exceptions.RbacOverPermission(msg)
             finally:
                 if CONF.patrole_log.enable_reporting:
                     RBACLOG.info(
@@ -181,6 +202,23 @@
     return decorator
 
 
+def _prepare_rules(rule, rules):
+    if rules is None:
+        rules = []
+    elif not isinstance(rules, (tuple, list)):
+        rules = [rules]
+    if rule:
+        deprecation_msg = (
+            "The `rule` argument has been deprecated in favor of `rules` "
+            "and will be removed in a future version.")
+        versionutils.report_deprecated_feature(LOG, deprecation_msg)
+        if rules:
+            LOG.debug("The `rules` argument will be used instead of `rule`.")
+        else:
+            rules.append(rule)
+    return rules
+
+
 def _is_authorized(test_obj, service, rule, extra_target_data):
     """Validates whether current RBAC role has permission to do policy action.
 
diff --git a/patrole_tempest_plugin/tests/api/compute/test_server_misc_policy_actions_rbac.py b/patrole_tempest_plugin/tests/api/compute/test_server_misc_policy_actions_rbac.py
index 63dee85..58a829d 100644
--- a/patrole_tempest_plugin/tests/api/compute/test_server_misc_policy_actions_rbac.py
+++ b/patrole_tempest_plugin/tests/api/compute/test_server_misc_policy_actions_rbac.py
@@ -395,7 +395,8 @@
 
     @rbac_rule_validation.action(
         service="nova",
-        rule="os_compute_api:os-lock-server:unlock:unlock_override")
+        rules=["os_compute_api:os-lock-server:unlock",
+               "os_compute_api:os-lock-server:unlock:unlock_override"])
     @decorators.idempotent_id('40dfeef9-73ee-48a9-be19-a219875de457')
     def test_unlock_server_override(self):
         """Test force unlock server, part of os-lock-server.
diff --git a/patrole_tempest_plugin/tests/api/volume/test_volume_basic_crud_rbac.py b/patrole_tempest_plugin/tests/api/volume/test_volume_basic_crud_rbac.py
index 1bd87d2..61532c6 100644
--- a/patrole_tempest_plugin/tests/api/volume/test_volume_basic_crud_rbac.py
+++ b/patrole_tempest_plugin/tests/api/volume/test_volume_basic_crud_rbac.py
@@ -62,11 +62,3 @@
         with self.rbac_utils.override_role(self):
             self.volumes_client.update_volume(self.volume['id'],
                                               name=update_name)
-
-    @rbac_rule_validation.action(
-        service="cinder",
-        rule="volume_extension:volume_image_metadata")
-    @decorators.idempotent_id('3d48ca91-f02b-4616-a69d-4a8b296c8529')
-    def test_volume_list_image_metadata(self):
-        with self.rbac_utils.override_role(self):
-            self.volumes_client.list_volumes(detail=True)
diff --git a/patrole_tempest_plugin/tests/unit/test_rbac_rule_validation.py b/patrole_tempest_plugin/tests/unit/test_rbac_rule_validation.py
index 85547e1..0a4c44b 100644
--- a/patrole_tempest_plugin/tests/unit/test_rbac_rule_validation.py
+++ b/patrole_tempest_plugin/tests/unit/test_rbac_rule_validation.py
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
 #    under the License.
 
 import mock
+from oslo_config import cfg
 
 from tempest.lib import exceptions
 from tempest import manager
@@ -24,11 +25,13 @@
 from patrole_tempest_plugin import rbac_utils
 from patrole_tempest_plugin.tests.unit import fixtures
 
+CONF = cfg.CONF
 
-class RBACRuleValidationTest(base.TestCase):
+
+class BaseRBACRuleValidationTest(base.TestCase):
 
     def setUp(self):
-        super(RBACRuleValidationTest, self).setUp()
+        super(BaseRBACRuleValidationTest, self).setUp()
         self.mock_test_args = mock.Mock(spec=test.BaseTestCase)
         self.mock_test_args.os_primary = mock.Mock(spec=manager.Manager)
         self.mock_test_args.rbac_utils = mock.Mock(
@@ -45,6 +48,12 @@
         self.useFixture(
             fixtures.ConfPatcher(enable_reporting=False, group='patrole_log'))
 
+
+class RBACRuleValidationTest(BaseRBACRuleValidationTest):
+    """Test suite for validating fundamental functionality for the
+    ``rbac_rule_validation`` decorator.
+    """
+
     @mock.patch.object(rbac_rv, 'LOG', autospec=True)
     @mock.patch.object(rbac_rv, 'policy_authority', autospec=True)
     def test_rule_validation_have_permission_no_exc(self, mock_authority,
@@ -98,11 +107,11 @@
         def test_policy(*args):
             raise exceptions.Forbidden()
 
-        test_re = "Role Member was not allowed to perform sentinel.action."
+        test_re = ("Role Member was not allowed to perform the following "
+                   "actions: \[%s\].*" % (mock.sentinel.action))
         self.assertRaisesRegex(exceptions.Forbidden, test_re, test_policy,
                                self.mock_test_args)
-        mock_log.error.assert_called_once_with("Role Member was not allowed to"
-                                               " perform sentinel.action.")
+        self.assertRegex(mock_log.error.mock_calls[0][1][0], test_re)
 
     @mock.patch.object(rbac_rv, 'LOG', autospec=True)
     @mock.patch.object(rbac_rv, 'policy_authority', autospec=True)
@@ -138,11 +147,11 @@
         def test_policy(*args):
             raise rbac_exceptions.RbacMalformedResponse()
 
-        test_re = "Role Member was not allowed to perform sentinel.action."
+        test_re = ("Role Member was not allowed to perform the following "
+                   "actions: \[%s\].*" % (mock.sentinel.action))
         self.assertRaisesRegex(exceptions.Forbidden, test_re, test_policy,
                                self.mock_test_args)
-        mock_log.error.assert_called_once_with("Role Member was not allowed to"
-                                               " perform sentinel.action.")
+        self.assertRegex(mock_log.error.mock_calls[0][1][0], test_re)
 
     @mock.patch.object(rbac_rv, 'LOG', autospec=True)
     @mock.patch.object(rbac_rv, 'policy_authority', autospec=True)
@@ -179,11 +188,11 @@
         def test_policy(*args):
             raise rbac_exceptions.RbacConflictingPolicies()
 
-        test_re = "Role Member was not allowed to perform sentinel.action."
+        test_re = ("Role Member was not allowed to perform the following "
+                   "actions: \[%s\].*" % (mock.sentinel.action))
         self.assertRaisesRegex(exceptions.Forbidden, test_re, test_policy,
                                self.mock_test_args)
-        mock_log.error.assert_called_once_with("Role Member was not allowed to"
-                                               " perform sentinel.action.")
+        self.assertRegex(mock_log.error.mock_calls[0][1][0], test_re)
 
     @mock.patch.object(rbac_rv, 'LOG', autospec=True)
     @mock.patch.object(rbac_rv, 'policy_authority', autospec=True)
@@ -233,25 +242,26 @@
             raise exceptions.NotFound()
 
         expected_errors = [
-            "Role Member was not allowed to perform sentinel.action.", None
+            ("Role Member was not allowed to perform the following "
+             "actions: \[%s\].*" % (mock.sentinel.action)),
+            None
         ]
 
         for pos, allowed in enumerate([True, False]):
             mock_authority.PolicyAuthority.return_value.allowed\
                 .return_value = allowed
 
-            expected_error = expected_errors[pos]
+            error_re = expected_errors[pos]
 
-            if expected_error:
-                self.assertRaisesRegex(
-                    exceptions.Forbidden, '.* ' + expected_error, test_policy,
-                    self.mock_test_args)
-                mock_log.error.assert_called_once_with(expected_error)
+            if error_re:
+                self.assertRaisesRegex(exceptions.Forbidden, error_re,
+                                       test_policy, self.mock_test_args)
+                self.assertRegex(mock_log.error.mock_calls[0][1][0], error_re)
             else:
                 test_policy(self.mock_test_args)
                 mock_log.error.assert_not_called()
 
-            mock_log.warning.assert_called_once_with(
+            mock_log.warning.assert_called_with(
                 "NotFound exception was caught for policy action {0}. The "
                 "service {1} throws a 404 instead of a 403, which is "
                 "irregular.".format(mock.sentinel.action,
@@ -284,13 +294,10 @@
         for test_policy in (
             test_policy_expect_forbidden, test_policy_expect_not_found):
 
-            error_re = (".* OverPermission: Role Member was allowed to perform"
-                        " sentinel.action")
+            error_re = ".*OverPermission: .* \[%s\]$" % mock.sentinel.action
             self.assertRaisesRegex(rbac_exceptions.RbacOverPermission,
                                    error_re, test_policy, self.mock_test_args)
-            mock_log.error.assert_called_once_with(
-                'Role %s was allowed to perform %s', 'Member',
-                mock.sentinel.action)
+            self.assertRegex(mock_log.error.mock_calls[0][1][0], error_re)
             mock_log.error.reset_mock()
 
     @mock.patch.object(rbac_rv, 'policy_authority', autospec=True)
@@ -405,3 +412,119 @@
             mock.sentinel.action,
             "Allowed",
             "Allowed")
+
+
+class RBACRuleValidationTestMultiPolicy(BaseRBACRuleValidationTest):
+    """Test suite for validating multi-policy support for the
+    ``rbac_rule_validation`` decorator.
+    """
+
+    def _assert_policy_authority_called_with(self, rules, mock_authority):
+        m_authority = mock_authority.PolicyAuthority.return_value
+        m_authority.allowed.assert_has_calls([
+            mock.call(rule, CONF.patrole.rbac_test_role) for rule in rules
+        ])
+
+    @mock.patch.object(rbac_rv, 'policy_authority', autospec=True)
+    def test_rule_validation_multi_policy_have_permission_success(
+            self, mock_authority):
+        """Test that when expected result is authorized and test passes that
+        the overall evaluation succeeds.
+        """
+        mock_authority.PolicyAuthority.return_value.allowed.\
+            return_value = True
+
+        rules = [mock.sentinel.action1, mock.sentinel.action2]
+
+        @rbac_rv.action(mock.sentinel.service, rules=rules)
+        def test_policy(*args):
+            pass
+
+        test_policy(self.mock_test_args)
+        self._assert_policy_authority_called_with(rules, mock_authority)
+
+    @mock.patch.object(rbac_rv, 'LOG', autospec=True)
+    @mock.patch.object(rbac_rv, 'policy_authority', autospec=True)
+    def test_rule_validation_multi_policy_overpermission_failure(
+            self, mock_authority, mock_log):
+        """Test that when expected result is unauthorized and test passes that
+        the overall evaluation results in an OverPermission getting raised.
+        """
+
+        rules = [
+            mock.sentinel.action1, mock.sentinel.action2, mock.sentinel.action3
+        ]
+
+        @rbac_rv.action(mock.sentinel.service, rules=rules)
+        def test_policy(*args):
+            pass
+
+        def _do_test(allowed_list, fail_on_action):
+            mock_authority.PolicyAuthority.return_value.allowed.side_effect = (
+                allowed_list)
+
+            error_re = ".*OverPermission: .* \[%s\]$" % fail_on_action
+            self.assertRaisesRegex(rbac_exceptions.RbacOverPermission,
+                                   error_re, test_policy, self.mock_test_args)
+            self.assertRegex(mock_log.error.mock_calls[0][1][0], error_re)
+            mock_log.error.reset_mock()
+            self._assert_policy_authority_called_with(rules, mock_authority)
+
+        _do_test([True, True, False], mock.sentinel.action3)
+        _do_test([False, True, True], mock.sentinel.action1)
+        _do_test([True, False, True], mock.sentinel.action2)
+
+    @mock.patch.object(rbac_rv, 'LOG', autospec=True)
+    @mock.patch.object(rbac_rv, 'policy_authority', autospec=True)
+    def test_rule_validation_multi_policy_forbidden_success(
+            self, mock_authority, mock_log):
+        """Test that when the expected result is unauthorized and the test
+        fails that the overall evaluation results in success.
+        """
+
+        rules = [
+            mock.sentinel.action1, mock.sentinel.action2, mock.sentinel.action3
+        ]
+
+        @rbac_rv.action(mock.sentinel.service, rules=rules)
+        def test_policy(*args):
+            raise exceptions.Forbidden()
+
+        def _do_test(allowed_list):
+            mock_authority.PolicyAuthority.return_value.allowed.\
+                side_effect = allowed_list
+            test_policy(self.mock_test_args)
+            mock_log.error.assert_not_called()
+            self._assert_policy_authority_called_with(rules, mock_authority)
+
+        _do_test([True, True, False])
+        _do_test([False, True, True])
+        _do_test([True, False, True])
+
+    @mock.patch.object(rbac_rv, 'LOG', autospec=True)
+    @mock.patch.object(rbac_rv, 'policy_authority', autospec=True)
+    def test_rule_validation_multi_policy_forbidden_failure(
+            self, mock_authority, mock_log):
+        """Test that when the expected result is authorized and the test
+        fails (with a Forbidden error code) that the overall evaluation
+        results a Forbidden getting raised.
+        """
+
+        # NOTE: Avoid mock.sentinel here due to weird sorting with them.
+        rules = ['action1', 'action2', 'action3']
+
+        @rbac_rv.action(mock.sentinel.service, rules=rules)
+        def test_policy(*args):
+            raise exceptions.Forbidden()
+
+        mock_authority.PolicyAuthority.return_value.allowed\
+            .return_value = True
+
+        error_re = ("Role Member was not allowed to perform the following "
+                    "actions: %s. Expected allowed actions: %s. Expected "
+                    "disallowed actions: []." % (rules, rules)).replace(
+                        '[', '\[').replace(']', '\]')
+        self.assertRaisesRegex(exceptions.Forbidden, error_re, test_policy,
+                               self.mock_test_args)
+        self.assertRegex(mock_log.error.mock_calls[0][1][0], error_re)
+        self._assert_policy_authority_called_with(rules, mock_authority)
diff --git a/releasenotes/notes/multi-policy-support-4e5c8b4e9e25ad9d.yaml b/releasenotes/notes/multi-policy-support-4e5c8b4e9e25ad9d.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3d192d9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/releasenotes/notes/multi-policy-support-4e5c8b4e9e25ad9d.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+---
+features:
+  - |
+    Patrole now offers support for multiple policies. The ``rules`` argument
+    has been added to the ``rbac_rule_validation.action`` decorator, which
+    takes a list of policy names which Patrole will use to determine the
+    expected test result. This allows Patrole to more accurately determine
+    whether RBAC is configured correctly, since some API endpoints enforce
+    multiple policies.
+deprecations:
+  - |
+    The ``rule`` argument in the ``rbac_rule_validation.action`` decorator has
+    been deprecated in favor of ``rules``.