)]}'
{
  "commit": "9594b3279fd8c1b6c9430ec1397693b8ce2cc743",
  "tree": "52774216503314eba84c30f61eb270c686db01c5",
  "parents": [
    "a4b30416df978e9e614ef1ad4538bb8f5d8b1e8d"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "gengchc2",
    "email": "geng.changcai2@zte.com.cn",
    "time": "Fri Dec 09 13:44:44 2016 +0800"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "gengchc2",
    "email": "geng.changcai2@zte.com.cn",
    "time": "Fri Dec 09 13:44:44 2016 +0800"
  },
  "message": "Replace six.iteritems() with .items()\n\n1.As mentioned in [1], we should avoid using\nsix.iteritems to achieve iterators. We can\nuse dict.items instead, as it will return\niterators in PY3 as well. And dict.items/keys\nwill more readable. 2.In py2, the performance\nabout list should be negligible, see the link [2].\n[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Python3\n[2] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-June/066391.html\n\nChange-Id: Ic68ba358d51002e1a1aeac6159248ffb730b5daf\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "c8b51633c7a1b94acd15574d3b9342d4541b4f11",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "manila_tempest_tests/tests/api/test_security_services.py",
      "new_id": "2e287039d9471f436c625ecb530200b5ea3d452e",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "manila_tempest_tests/tests/api/test_security_services.py"
    },
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "577c5a4eca81c7a91223d108545d2b511c779c04",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "manila_tempest_tests/tests/api/test_share_networks.py",
      "new_id": "70f1494d51fbab717b666b8de1e386f947b42725",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "manila_tempest_tests/tests/api/test_share_networks.py"
    }
  ]
}